[DUX]

Honestly, I'd like to know. First of all, I'll admit that I dislike Buells. I've spent some time on an XB12s and come away thinking the only reason you'd buy one is b/c you wanted a "sport-bike" and thought that it mattered that somewhere way down the line it had a little Harley in it. Very heavy low-speed steering, poor shifter, awkward high-speed steering, power is OK. I also think the fit and finish is second-rate.

I've always felt that Buell is about innovation for innovation's sake, not necessarily b/c it improves the machine or it's performance. Buell now has a "dual-sport," the Ulysses. In all of the comparisons and reviews, I have yet to see someone point out that a a belt final-drive is a poor choice for a bike that will theoretically see dirt, rocks, and mud.

Someone please tell me what it is that I don't see.

[phobiaphobe]

I'll admit, I like the looks of the 12s with the super short wheelbase and stubby tail. I'd like to try one, just to say I did. But I'll just keep riding my Jap crap.

[DUX]

Trust me. I went in with an open mind and it was a disappointment.

[phobiaphobe]

Originally Posted by DUX

...

I've always felt that Buell is about innovation for innovation's sake, not necessarily b/c it improves the machine or it's performance. ....

I'm with you on that one. What is the advantage of oil in the swingarm? More unsprung weight? More potential for leaks? And fuel in the frame spars... Doesn't that polarize mass?

And I don't care what excuses they make about how the Harley motor is superior... that rear cylinder will always run way hot.

[ND4SPD]

I've ridden an XB9...couldn't wait to pull over and get my Honda back. Been a while so I can't remember exactly, but I think I even gave it a hug.

[phobiaphobe]

Originally Posted by DUX

Trust me. I went in with an open mind and it was a disappointment.

My dad and brother tried the 9 at a demo ride and were like "when does the power start OH **** there's the rev limiter again."