The 97-98 F3's had a longer shock/spring and different linkage pivot point compared to the 95-96 F3 (which looks more like the 91-93 F3 bits). The question is, which one do I want for my 92 F2? I'm guessing that the 95-96 unit would drop right in since it more closely resembles the 92 F2 rear shock/linkage, but is there any benefit to using the longer 97-98 rear shock and linkage? I would assume that using the 97-98 rear shock alone with the 92 F2 linkage would result in a higher rear ride height. Would the 97-98 linkage correct this? I've been reading that racers like to raise the rear anyways, but I've been reading so much conflicting info, so I thought I'd ask.
Thanks for any info you can provide!
FWIW, I'm 170lbs, and use the bike for 70% street, 30% track.