Quote:
|
Originally Posted by luvtolean Your statements are not based on any type of scientific fact. Do you understand how chemicals breakdown? What "current rate" do you speak of? Which chemical compound is it that is so insidiously poisoning the human race?
Most people who know me would classify me as a borderline tree hugger. But I base my complaints on fact, not on intuition. |
Claim: Scientists agree that failing to respond to the threat of global warming now could prove disastrous for some parts of the globe.
Fact: A survey of over 400 German, American and Canadian climate researchers conducted by the Meteorologisches Institut der Universitat Hamburg and the GKSS Forschungszentrum found that 67% of those surveyed either disagreed or were uncertain about the proposition that global warming will occur so quickly that lack of preparation could prove disastrous.
The preceding is talking point #1 for global warming naysayers at the National Center for Public Policy Research. Apparently this august body is too stupid to realize that their first talking point implies that the argument cited by the "Institut" is whether global warming is going to be nasty or deadly. The very argument illustrates the consensus that global warming is a fact. Duh! "What a bunch of moroons..." --To quote Bugs Bunny.
L2L, the Earth is not some shithouse that gets pumped out occasionally by an unfortunate dude desperate to pay the rent. If the crap comes in at a faster rate than can be naturally absorbed or leaked it will cause a **** overload. Now you can argue about determining the rate that **** can be absorbed or scrubbed by natural dynamics but sometimes ya just gotta look out the freakin' window. Or you could read this:
http://www.wildweather.com/features/global_warming.htm