How many Bush Administration officials does it take to change a light bulb?

Cowboy1600 · 02-14-2005, 2:20 AM

A: None. There is nothing wrong with the light bulb; its condition is
improving every day. Any reports of its lack of incandescence are illusional spin
from the liberal media. Illuminating rooms is hard work. That light bulb has
served honourably,and anything you say undermines the lighting effort. Why do you hate freedom?

Jungleboy · 02-14-2005, 5:10 AM

Causing trouble again I see!

colryn · 02-14-2005, 7:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cowboy1600

A: None. There is nothing wrong with the light bulb; its condition is
improving every day. Any reports of its lack of incandescence are illusional spin
from the liberal media. Illuminating rooms is hard work. That light bulb has
served honourably,and anything you say undermines the lighting effort. Why do you hate freedom?

Cowboy,

why must you go out of your way to bash the US? Is this just an attempt to stir the pot?

ccwilli3 · 02-14-2005, 8:09 AM

rebel without a cause, he's goin' platinum...

Baketech · 02-14-2005, 8:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by colryn

Cowboy,

why must you go out of your way to bash the US?

Probly because it's all the sad old git has in his life....leave him be and let him have his day....

ND4SPD · 02-14-2005, 8:32 AM

bwhip · 02-14-2005, 9:24 AM

sheepofblue · 02-14-2005, 11:13 AM

Dang you got me, I thought the answer was 5. After all it is the government..... Wait I see it, if you depend on the government to do it, it won't get done. Zero is the right answer.

Cowboy1600 · 02-14-2005, 4:47 PM

Its a joke poeple.....

cbr99xx · 02-14-2005, 7:43 PM

Not that it matters... but why would you post a joke in the political forum?

The correct answer... No matter what administration... would be thousands. There would be committees assigned to study the average light bulb life... (Just to make sure we weren't being ripped off by a vendor). Labor would have to study the situation to determine exactly which union should be called upon. Health would be called upon to make sure that the proper wattage bulb was used. The EPA would be called upon to make sure we weren't in jeopardy of extinguishing any wildlife with our bulb placement and wattage choice. This could go on for days... bottom line. When the media catches wind of the whole situation there will be a 'select congressional committee assigned' to investigate the "rumored" misappropriation of funds.

Remember... This happens, no matter what political party is in office... It's enough to make someone a cynic... can you tell??

sheepofblue · 02-14-2005, 7:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cbr99xx

Not that it matters... but why would you post a joke in the political forum?

The correct answer... No matter what administration... would be thousands. There would be committees assigned to study the average light bulb life... (Just to make sure we weren't be ripped off by a vendor). Labor would have to study the situation to determine exactly which union should be called upon. Health would be called upon to make sure that the proper wattage bulb was used. The EPA would be called upon to make sure we weren't in jeopardy of extinguishing any wildlife with our bulb placement and wattage choice. This could go on for days... bottom line. When the media catches wind of the whole situation there will be a 'select congressional committee assigned' to investigate the "rumored" misappropriation of funds.

Remember... This happens, no matter what political party is in office... It's enough to make someone a cynic... can you tell??

Agree and we go the joke Cowboy. Of course the real question is why is the government changing light bulbs.

matt232 · 02-17-2005, 7:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cbr99xx

Not that it matters... but why would you post a joke in the political forum?

He was probably just saving Conq the time of move it here in the end anyway.