Towing / Transport: Discussion of Trailers, Wheel Chocks, Tie-Downs, Ramps, etc for Transporting Motorcycles.
| |
abtech, time to retire the PITBIKE?
09-08-2005, 12:14 PM
|
#1 | | Resigned to pursue other interests.
Join Date: 05-01-2001 Location: Raleigh, NC
Bike(s): 2007 Honda ST1300 Age: 36 Posts: 12,313
Rep Power: 28
| abtech, time to retire the PITBIKE? |
| |
09-08-2005, 12:22 PM
|
#2 | | Blow me.
Join Date: 05-23-2004 Location: Omnipresent
Bike(s): 998RR4 Age: 26 Posts: 11,500
Rep Power: 32
| Re: abtech, time to retire the PITBIKE? You couldn't give him a Freightliner. |
| |
09-08-2005, 12:57 PM
|
#3 |
Join Date: 07-23-2001 Location: Motor City, Michigan
Bike(s): '01 CBR929 Age: 49 Posts: 7,927
Rep Power: 22
| Re: abtech, time to retire the PITBIKE? Odd...Reg was trying to get out of the business altogether, but this ad makes it sound like he's not.
Wonder if he'll trade for a 6 x 12? 
__________________ "It is better to post and risk reposting than to have never posted at all." |
| |
09-08-2005, 5:15 PM
|
#4 |
Join Date: 06-05-2001 Location: Murder City, Michigan
Bike(s): 2007 RC51 Age: 58 Posts: 8,271
Rep Power: 28
| Re: abtech, time to retire the PITBIKE? That wouldn't be a step up, believe me . . . |
| |
09-08-2005, 5:37 PM
|
#5 | | Meatarian
Join Date: 05-06-2004 Location: Randolph, MA
Bike(s): 01 R/B 929 Age: 28 Posts: 12,236
Rep Power: 26
| Re: abtech, time to retire the PITBIKE? Quote: |
Originally Posted by phobiaphobe You couldn't give him a Freightliner. | all the freightliners I've driver (never a big one like this though) have sucked. The suspension and chassis in all of them just flat out sucked.
__________________
"let's face it when you went into that voting booth you had a choice between 2 bowls of sh!t. the only difference was the smell"
|
| |
09-08-2005, 5:41 PM
|
#6 |
Join Date: 06-05-2001 Location: Murder City, Michigan
Bike(s): 2007 RC51 Age: 58 Posts: 8,271
Rep Power: 28
| Re: abtech, time to retire the PITBIKE? Quote: |
Originally Posted by CBR929RE all the freightliners I've driver (never a big one like this though) have sucked. The suspension and chassis in all of them just flat out sucked. | They may have improved in the recent past, but I drove a 2005 Century Class with all the trimmings in May and it still handled like an office building, sucked fuel (3.5 mpg best case with half load pulling a 48' air ride trailer) and was so noisy I couldn't take more than 2 hours in the cab . . . |
| |
09-08-2005, 5:52 PM
|
#7 | | | Re: abtech, time to retire the PITBIKE? Quote: |
Originally Posted by abtech They may have improved in the recent past, but I drove a 2005 Century Class with all the trimmings in May and it still handled like an office building, sucked fuel (3.5 mpg best case with half load pulling a 48' air ride trailer) and was so noisy I couldn't take more than 2 hours in the cab . . . | Sissy!  | |
| |
09-09-2005, 8:08 AM
|
#8 |
Join Date: 06-05-2001 Location: Murder City, Michigan
Bike(s): 2007 RC51 Age: 58 Posts: 8,271
Rep Power: 28
| Re: abtech, time to retire the PITBIKE? Quote: |
Originally Posted by SPEED Sissy!  | Drove it back to back with a new Pete 386 and to call them both trucks is a real stretch. The Pete handled 10 times better, had a tighter turning radius (same wheelbase), was much smoother, had more power and got over 6 mpg on the same run. The cab noise was order of magnitude lower than the Crateliner as well. Interestingly, the price difference between the 2 tractors was less than 12K . . . |
| |
09-09-2005, 8:20 AM
|
#9 | | Send Maple Clarice
Join Date: 07-12-2004 Location: Huntsville AL
Bike(s): '04 CBR1000RR, '84 Ascot, '02 RC51 Posts: 13,814
Rep Power: 31
| Re: abtech, time to retire the PITBIKE? There's 385 other Pete's  |
| |
09-09-2005, 10:30 AM
|
#10 |
Join Date: 06-05-2001 Location: Murder City, Michigan
Bike(s): 2007 RC51 Age: 58 Posts: 8,271
Rep Power: 28
| Re: abtech, time to retire the PITBIKE? Quote: |
Originally Posted by sheepofblue There's 385 other Pete's  | I think so. I owned a 362 (Cabover) and a couple of 379 conventionals. Some of the models are special builds for a limited market (mining tractors etc.). |
| |
09-09-2005, 10:40 AM
|
#11 | | Send Maple Clarice
Join Date: 07-12-2004 Location: Huntsville AL
Bike(s): '04 CBR1000RR, '84 Ascot, '02 RC51 Posts: 13,814
Rep Power: 31
| Re: abtech, time to retire the PITBIKE? +1 for me  |
| |
09-09-2005, 11:26 AM
|
#12 |
Join Date: 07-23-2001 Location: Motor City, Michigan
Bike(s): '01 CBR929 Age: 49 Posts: 7,927
Rep Power: 22
| Re: abtech, time to retire the PITBIKE? Quote: |
Originally Posted by sheepofblue +1 for me  | That one flew right over his head! 
__________________ "It is better to post and risk reposting than to have never posted at all." |
| |
09-09-2005, 1:01 PM
|
#13 | | | Re: abtech, time to retire the PITBIKE? Quote: |
Originally Posted by abtech Drove it back to back with a new Pete 386 and to call them both trucks is a real stretch. The Pete handled 10 times better, had a tighter turning radius (same wheelbase), was much smoother, had more power and got over 6 mpg on the same run. The cab noise was order of magnitude lower than the Crateliner as well. Interestingly, the price difference between the 2 tractors was less than 12K . . . | Everybody knows a Pete is a better made tractor but since I've been a company driver all these years I rarely get a chance to drive them. I've pretty much gotten used to road and engine noises, just turn up the stereo and they almost disapear, lol. The Freightshaker Century class did turn out to have a whole lot of problems from what I've heard but the Clasic XL is a pretty decent tractor http://www.truckpaper.com/listings/forsale/detail.asp?OHID=984835&guid=76721980DC89484A8BD493 1702B00254 | |
| |
09-09-2005, 3:02 PM
|
#14 |
Join Date: 06-05-2001 Location: Murder City, Michigan
Bike(s): 2007 RC51 Age: 58 Posts: 8,271
Rep Power: 28
| Re: abtech, time to retire the PITBIKE? Quote: |
Originally Posted by SPEED | You know it and I know it (and everyone who has driven a Pete or KW knows it), but the word I keep hearing is how Freightliner has turned around and makes "better" tractors than the PACCAR group. I certainly don't log the miles I used to and you sure see lot's of the Freightslimers on the road, but you would have to be on drugs (and good ones at that) to say they are even nearly as good as number 1 and number 2 (Pete & KW). |
| |
09-09-2005, 3:20 PM
|
#15 | | | Re: abtech, time to retire the PITBIKE? Quote: |
Originally Posted by abtech You know it and I know it (and everyone who has driven a Pete or KW knows it), but the word I keep hearing is how Freightliner has turned around and makes "better" tractors than the PACCAR group. I certainly don't log the miles I used to and you sure see lot's of the Freightslimers on the road, but you would have to be on drugs (and good ones at that) to say they are even nearly as good as number 1 and number 2 (Pete & KW). | I drove KW's for almost a year and never felt comfortable on long drives, I would get the worst stiff neck every time out.
The company I work for right now uses International & in the last couple years been moving over to Sterling (Ford) with Mercedes motors......they have the worst loud hum above a certain RPM http://www.sterlingtrucks.com/P.asp?...n&Line =ALine | |
| |
09-09-2005, 3:20 PM
|
#16 |
Join Date: 12-29-2001 Location: New Jersey, USA
Bike(s): '01 CBR 929 black & red, K7 GSX-R600 Age: 48 Posts: 6,468
Rep Power: 17
| Re: abtech, time to retire the PITBIKE? What? That's not nice, saying PETE is built like a tractor!  |
| |
09-09-2005, 3:23 PM
|
#17 |
Join Date: 07-25-2002 Location: Ridgecrest, CA
Bike(s): 04 600RR, 03 XR50, 05 TC250 Age: 65 Posts: 4,668
Rep Power: 18
| Re: abtech, time to retire the PITBIKE? Quote: |
Originally Posted by HondaGalToo What? That's not nice, saying PETE is built like a tractor!  | Ok Ok...the tractor's built like PETE. |
| |
09-09-2005, 3:29 PM
|
#18 | | Mr. Brownstone
Join Date: 02-07-2002 Location: UT
Bike(s): 05 600RR Posts: 10,531
Rep Power: 35
| Re: abtech, time to retire the PITBIKE? Abtech, who owns Freightliner now? If I'm thinking of the right company they were started in the WWII era in Salt Lake City, but they were purchased and moved away quite some time ago.
Maybe it's a different company. Maybe I should just do a search.
EDIT: Yep, they're the ones. They were bought by Daimler-Benz in '81. I guess that's why they went in the sh1tter.
Last edited by BDA116 : 09-09-2005 at 3:37 PM.
|
| |
09-09-2005, 3:38 PM
|
#19 | | | Re: abtech, time to retire the PITBIKE? Quote: |
Originally Posted by BDA116 Abtech, who owns Freightliner now? If I'm thinking of the right company they were started in the WWII era in Salt Lake City, but they were purchased and moved away quite some time ago.
Maybe it's a different company. Maybe I should just do a search.  | I'm not Abtech but here you go... http://www.forbes.com/2002/06/18/0618flint.html | |
| |
09-09-2005, 6:00 PM
|
#20 |
Join Date: 01-03-2004 Location: INDIANA
Bike(s): GSXR Stunt Bike Age: 39 Posts: 4,200
Rep Power: 22
| Re: abtech, time to retire the PITBIKE? I used to drive OTR and drove a couple of different rigs but i've got to say Freightshaker is the closest thing to driving an 80k lb hay wagon i've ever seen. I drove a 660 Volve for about a year and a half and loved it. Long trips were a pleasure and the creature comforts were ok. If you are going from a largecar to a volvo as I did it takes some getting used to but it is worth it IMO. The torning radius is unbelieviable, about the same as a day cab. The ride was nice and very little noise, kins of like driving a passenger car. If I were to go back to OTR it would be in a Volvo.
Last edited by Hammer : 03-05-2007 at 7:13 PM.
|
| |
09-09-2005, 6:01 PM
|
#21 | | Meatarian
Join Date: 05-06-2004 Location: Randolph, MA
Bike(s): 01 R/B 929 Age: 28 Posts: 12,236
Rep Power: 26
| Re: abtech, time to retire the PITBIKE? Quote: |
Originally Posted by SPEED I drove KW's for almost a year and never felt comfortable on long drives, I would get the worst stiff neck every time out.
The company I work for right now uses International & in the last couple years been moving over to Sterling (Ford) with Mercedes motors......they have the worst loud hum above a certain RPM http://www.sterlingtrucks.com/P.asp?...n&Line =ALine | it was a dream of mine back in high school to own a Peterbilt with 8000 lights and drive it cross country.
I also like the KW but haven't driven either. I will say Macks are atleast a step above Freightcrappers, not by a hell of a lot but noticeably better. I have to say my favorite truck that I've driven was a Sterling. But I did only drive them for very short distances (friend let me drive his work truck one time and I drove one on a job driving test thing).
edit; after reading Hammers post I was reminded of how much I wanna drive one of them Volvos (yeah I know that sounds weird doesn't it). And the new ones are some nice looking trucks.
__________________
"let's face it when you went into that voting booth you had a choice between 2 bowls of sh!t. the only difference was the smell"
|
| |
09-09-2005, 6:05 PM
|
#22 | | Blow me.
Join Date: 05-23-2004 Location: Omnipresent
Bike(s): 998RR4 Age: 26 Posts: 11,500
Rep Power: 32
| Re: abtech, time to retire the PITBIKE? Quote: |
Originally Posted by CBR929RE it was a dream of mine back in high school to own a Peterbilt with 8000 lights and drive it cross country.
... | Did part of that dream entail touring the national pro arm-wrestling circuit?
This thread wins the prize for "most creative use of derogatory pet names for a truck manufacturer". |
| |
09-09-2005, 6:08 PM
|
#23 | | Meatarian
Join Date: 05-06-2004 Location: Randolph, MA
Bike(s): 01 R/B 929 Age: 28 Posts: 12,236
Rep Power: 26
| Re: abtech, time to retire the PITBIKE? Quote: |
Originally Posted by phobiaphobe Did part of that dream entail touring the national pro arm-wrestling circuit?
This thread wins the prize for "most creative use of derogatory pet names for a truck manufacturer". | I never really wanted to go "Over the Top"
you also have to remember I'm one of the scrawniest people here (5"4' 118lbs wet) so I wouldn't have even won the women's competition (even taking away the huge lumberjack ladies) < | |