Topic Review (Newest First) |
03-13-2017 4:04 AM | |
Bikelifesinceth |
Quote:
Originally Posted by crazycuRRie
View Post
In all your hard riding you have never experianced a tank slapper
![]() |
08-11-2005 8:16 AM | |
Stealth |
Re: Steering Dampaner Quote:
Originally Posted by sweetonion
For the amount of money we're talking about I really don't understand the "I've never had one so I don't need it," argument.How about, "I've ridden 100,000 miles without an accident. So I just don't need a helmet."
![]() |
04-29-2004 1:29 PM | |
Athens954 |
Re: Steering Dampaner Quote:
Originally Posted by matt232
My car is collecting dust now.....
In about a week I will have closed one year when I had the car serviced. The funny thing, is that I have done a little under 3000km. How's that for economy ![]() I get to service my car once a year ![]() |
04-29-2004 1:20 PM | |
matt232 |
Re: Steering Dampaner Quote:
Originally Posted by aussie_929
lol mate I'm going to lose any status update you throw up. I still only have the 205klms on it. I only use it on the weekends as I have a company car for work.
My car is collecting dust now.....the bike and I are permanently attached, and have been for 700km |
04-29-2004 9:48 AM | |
gr0undz3r0 |
Re: Steering Dampaner Well - just an update from the Thread starter - Head got shaking nice in a quick lefthander @ about 120 - 130. So Ill be getting a Scotts... Proof is in the fact that it scared the crap outta me. count me in - Ill buy as soon as I can spell a-b-l-e. |
04-29-2004 8:35 AM | |
Jungleboy |
Re: Steering Dampaner Quote:
Originally Posted by abtech
The more conventional (and less nervous) technique to get the same overall results would be to use .95 springs, 110 mm oil height (5 wt Showa), 36 to 38 mm of sag and zero front end drop. The 30 mm sag in the rear is fine. You will find more ground clearance, straight line stability, excellent turn in and less nosedive on the brakes. I am assuming the 200 pound figure is your suited weight, if not you may even want to try 1.0 springs . . .
Ps. I fluctuate from about 190-200 without gear. |
04-29-2004 1:16 AM | |
roadrash929 |
Re: Steering Dampaner Quote:
Originally Posted by gr0undz3r0
Little information please. I see lots of steering dampaners on bikes. I personaly have never owned on. What are the beinfets for a guy that has no track intention at the moment. I ride pretty hard and just wonder what it would help.
thanx |
04-22-2004 6:40 PM | |
aussie_929 |
Re: Steering Dampaner Quote:
Originally Posted by matt232
Status update:
She sits in the garage with exactly 400km on the tripmeter, aussie_929 how about yourself? lol mate I'm going to lose any status update you throw up. I still only have the 205klms on it. I only use it on the weekends as I have a company car for work. |
04-22-2004 1:30 PM | |
abtech |
Re: Steering Dampaner Quote:
Originally Posted by slowpoke
So what's this deal about 86 octane?
![]() That is all . . . |
04-22-2004 1:22 PM | |
slowpoke |
Re: Steering Dampaner So what's this deal about 86 octane? ![]() |
04-22-2004 1:04 PM | |
abtech |
Re: Steering Dampaner Quote:
Originally Posted by FuTAnT
You've got to remember that head shake is a component of various elements.
Steering angle, front wheel weight and suspension set up. If it's quite steep it will want to slap. I dare say this has to to with the natural damping effects of the steering angle. You've also got the front wheel weight. The more weight that is over the front wheel there is less tendancy to shake. It's either weight on, or completely off so the road doesn't contact the wheel. Lastly you've got your suspension. You need to return the tyre to the road as quick as possible so it's not floating about and able to move in mid air. This is why the stock suspension is so ****. It's way overdamped and undersprung at the front. The result is it hits a bump and doesn't move then slaps like a bitch. Essentially it's that middle ground where there is little weight on the front wheel that causes all the trouble. Ie under hard acceleration, or when you hit a bump mid corner and the suspension doesn't return the front tyre to the ground in the correct manner. Hence the comment that tank slapper can be sorted through suspension (and they can, as my bike is fine now). While total trail is also affected by the rear wheel (ie: swingarm length and relative distances between axle/swingarm pivot etc.), it is the trail (or lack thereof) in the front steering mechanism that determines a bike's overall high speed stability. Simply optimizing your suspension does not change the geometry as the 929 (and to a slightly lesser degree the 954) have very small trail numbers with respect to wheelbase. Add extremely large static and loaded front wheel sag (in a stock configuration) and you further reduce this trail figure making the "as delivered" package a handful under the best of circumstances. Many Blade owners get some very suspect advice and proceed to "fix" their bike by lowering the triple clamps in an attempt to make an already quick steering bike turn even quicker. As I have mentioned before, lowering the front end (or conversely raising the rear) do not put "more weight" (well, it actually does, but such a tiny amount, that any positive effect is negligable) on the front wheel making it turn faster. It does exactly 3 things: Reduces ground clearance Reduces trail and increases high speed instability Makes turning the bike require less effort from the rider Actually, raising the rear doesn't reduce ground clearance and although it makes turning easier, it can also (depending on how far it is raised) reduce traction during corner exit and increase oversteer under acceleration. |
04-22-2004 12:59 PM | |
luvtolean |
Re: Steering Dampaner I met .org member Cowboy at a track day a couple of years ago. He'd raised his forks in the clamps (more fork above) and was telling me about it. I basically told him, "dude, you're not going to like it, but let me know how it goes". He came in and couldn't get the wrenches out fast enough to drop the front end down, and get the fork flush with the clamp. I have always run the forks flush, but I've also messed with lots of rear ride height, which also loads the front. This will also make the bike "slap like a bitch". If you're happy with your set-up, that's cool. But yours isn't the experience of most guys with 929's I've known. |
04-22-2004 12:07 PM | |
FuTAnT |
Re: Steering Dampaner Quote:
Originally Posted by abtech
Dropping the triples any amount on the tubes reduces trail and makes the bike MORE prone to shake (or am I reading this wrong?). Most of the racers (self included) actually raised the triples to ADD some trail (and ground clearance which is seriously lacking).
Re the WP shock, is it the same overall length as the OEM unit? Did you shorten or lengthen it? This would make a bike difference depending on the ratio of change front to rear on the ride height. Are you using the stock tires or have you changed model or brand? No two different manufacturer's tires are the same diameter (and overall height) and this will greatly affect the trail as well. Steering angle, front wheel weight and suspension set up. If it's quite steep it will want to slap. I dare say this has to to with the natural damping effects of the steering angle. You've also got the front wheel weight. The more weight that is over the front wheel there is less tendancy to shake. It's either weight on, or completely off so the road doesn't contact the wheel. Lastly you've got your suspension. You need to return the tyre to the road as quick as possible so it's not floating about and able to move in mid air. This is why the stock suspension is so ****. It's way overdamped and undersprung at the front. The result is it hits a bump and doesn't move then slaps like a bitch. Essentially it's that middle ground where there is little weight on the front wheel that causes all the trouble. Ie under hard acceleration, or when you hit a bump mid corner and the suspension doesn't return the front tyre to the ground in the correct manner. Hence the comment that tank slapper can be sorted through suspension (and they can, as my bike is fine now). |
04-22-2004 9:59 AM | |
matt232 |
Re: Steering Dampaner Quote:
Originally Posted by aussie_929
lol I doubt that I will be catching up anytime soon. I like short fast rides so I dont really rack up many klms.
After almost 3 yrs of owning the 929 I only had like 5800klms on it ![]() She sits in the garage with exactly 400km on the tripmeter, aussie_929 how about yourself? |
04-21-2004 10:10 AM | |
abtech |
Re: Steering Dampaner Quote:
Originally Posted by Jungleboy
Mine is dropped 10mm in the front (10mm from upper edge of tripple clamp to the mating line of the fork tube/fork cap) with 28-32mm sag at the front with 0.90kg/mm springs and revalved and 30mm sag at the rear (spring preload adjuster in position #6) , it is a bit nervous but turns in beatifully, I admit that its not the most stable at speed but im willing to compromise to get it cornering how i like! I will definately be getting a damper in the near future!
ps. I weight about 200lbs |
This thread has more than 15 replies. Click here to review the whole thread. |
Posting Rules | |