A viable third party...2 questions - Honda Motorcycles - FireBlades.org
Politics Discussion of Politics. Heated discussions are expected with this subject matter. If you don't have a thick skin, stay away. If you would like to block posts from this forum, see here.

User Tag List

 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 7 Old 07-01-2007, 6:55 PM Thread Starter
 
Join Date: 11-14-2005
Posts: 2,114
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Reputation Power: 0
   
A viable third party...2 questions

For those of you both authorized and willing to vote in the next US prez election( and anyone with an opinion, of course), and other elections...Would you be open to a third party?

What specifically would that party need to say and represent to garner your vote?

Last edited by analogbear; 07-01-2007 at 8:41 PM.
analogbear is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 7 Old 07-01-2007, 7:05 PM
 
.OrgOwner's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-16-2007
Age: 54
Posts: 2,281
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Reputation Power: 18
       
Re: A viable third party...2 questions

Looking at the US, Australia & England it seems the same question could be asked - it often seems to be a 2 party choice. I am always willing to look at alternatives but the best minds always end up in the private sector where the real money is.
.OrgOwner is offline  
post #3 of 7 Old 07-01-2007, 8:43 PM Thread Starter
 
Join Date: 11-14-2005
Posts: 2,114
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Reputation Power: 0
   
Re: A viable third party...2 questions

Quote:
Originally Posted by .OrgOwner View Post
the best minds always end up in the private sector where the real money is.
Following that reasoning, do you think we ought to limit the power to vote to ONLY those with money?

Should only the rich have the vote, because they earned "more" and are then somehow smarter than the rest of us?
analogbear is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #4 of 7 Old 07-01-2007, 9:10 PM
 
.OrgOwner's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-16-2007
Age: 54
Posts: 2,281
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Reputation Power: 18
       
Re: A viable third party...2 questions

Quote:
Originally Posted by analogbear View Post
Following that reasoning, do you think we ought to limit the power to vote to ONLY those with money?

Should only the rich have the vote, because they earned "more" and are then somehow smarter than the rest of us?
No, voting should be compulsory for everyone and it should be taken seriously. My point was that a lot of qualified people may never consider a political career option because the private sector offers more.
.OrgOwner is offline  
post #5 of 7 Old 07-01-2007, 9:31 PM Thread Starter
 
Join Date: 11-14-2005
Posts: 2,114
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Reputation Power: 0
   
Re: A viable third party...2 questions

Quote:
Originally Posted by .OrgOwner View Post
No, voting should be compulsory for everyone and it should be taken seriously. My point was that a lot of qualified people may never consider a political career option because the private sector offers more.
Is that not oxymoronic, though? Just about any compulsory thing is derided as an unpleasant obligation, not an honorable duty/privilege...

I sort of agree that many eschew public-political life; but there are some talented folks that, were the lower house of a given legislature staffed randomly, would serve and bring that competence to bear for the betterment of the given-nation...
analogbear is offline  
post #6 of 7 Old 07-01-2007, 9:51 PM
 
.OrgOwner's Avatar
 
Join Date: 04-16-2007
Age: 54
Posts: 2,281
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Reputation Power: 18
       
Re: A viable third party...2 questions

Make it compulsory some people will "donkey" vote yes but it will force a percentage of people to think and choose.
.OrgOwner is offline  
post #7 of 7 Old 07-02-2007, 8:53 AM Thread Starter
 
Join Date: 11-14-2005
Posts: 2,114
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Reputation Power: 0
   
Re: A viable third party...2 questions

Quote:
Originally Posted by .OrgOwner View Post
Make it compulsory some people will "donkey" vote yes but it will force a percentage of people to think and choose.
From your mouth to god's ears, my friend...
analogbear is offline  
Reply

  Lower Navigation
Go Back   Honda Motorcycles - FireBlades.org > Other > Politics

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Honda Motorcycles - FireBlades.org forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
A valid e-mail address is REQUIRED. You will not have access to any site features until you activate your account using the activation e-mail that is sent to this address.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in










Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
UPDATED: Unfortunate Incident: Third Doctor Visit NanoSfere General Discussion 69 07-15-2006 10:25 AM
Can you pass the third grade? MrX954 Off-Topic 32 11-19-2005 12:09 AM
A third sheep? sheepofblue Off-Topic 22 10-06-2005 2:42 PM
Third Annual FireBlades.org Member Roast ConqSoft General Discussion 55 06-10-2004 3:05 PM
Blair Seeks Third Term Baketech Politics 2 02-21-2004 9:57 PM

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome